NewJeans’ Hanni Faces Allegations of Illegal Stay: "Effect of E-6 Visa After Contract Termination"

Allegations of illegal stay have surfaced regarding NewJeans’ Hanni, introducing a new variable to her ongoing contract dispute with ADOR.

The controversy centers on whether her E-6 visa remains valid following the termination of her exclusive contract.

■ Allegations of Illegal Stay and the Ministry of Justice’s Position‍

The Investigation Division of the Seoul Immigration Office received a complaint from an anonymous citizen concerning Hanni's alleged illegal stay.

The Ministry of Justice responded cautiously, stating, "We cannot comment on individual cases involving potential violations of the Immigration Control Act by foreign nationals."

However, it clarified that the residency status and duration for E-6 visa holders, such as foreign entertainers, depend on their employment contracts with their agencies.

■ The Specifics of the E-6 Visa‍

As an Australian-Vietnamese dual national, Hanni requires an E-6 (entertainment) visa to continue her activities in South Korea.

This visa is contingent upon an employment contract with an agency and must be renewed annually.

Failure to extend the visa through her agency could result in deportation.

■ Conflict Between Contract Disputes and Visa Issues‍

After NewJeans’ announcement of the termination of their exclusive contract on November 29, the validity of Hanni’s visa has become a critical issue.

While she claims independence and continues her activities, questions have arisen about the legal standing of her visa, which was issued under ADOR’s sponsorship.

■ Expert Analysis‍

Entertainment industry experts highlight the importance of the departure deadline and the grace period.

Although December 29 was reportedly the deadline for her departure, the visa issued by ADOR is believed to remain valid until early this year, suggesting no immediate legal concerns.

However, experts caution that legal complications may arise if Hanni engages in activities outside ADOR’s oversight.

‍

‍

■ ADOR’s Stance‍

ADOR maintains that its exclusive contract with NewJeans, including Hanni, is still valid and has initiated legal proceedings to enforce this claim.

The agency also stated that they are in the process of renewing Hanni’s visa.

However, the deepening conflict between both parties casts uncertainty on these efforts.

■ Future Outlook and Challenges‍

This case underscores the need for institutional reforms regarding the residency qualifications of foreign artists in the K-pop industry.

Specifically, clear guidelines are required to address visa issues that may arise during contract disputes.

The controversy highlights a structural issue within the K-pop industry, where contract disputes between agencies and artists can escalate into residency complications.

This calls for urgent improvements to related systems.

As the court determines the validity of Hanni’s exclusive contract and immigration authorities make their decision, this case may pave the way for better protection and clearer regulations for foreign artists in the K-pop industry.